SHSelfHostIndex

Maddy Mail Server vs NeoMutt

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
MA Maddy Mail Server Composable, all-in-one mail server in Go VS NE NeoMutt Feature-rich terminal email client
FeatureMaddy Mail ServerNeoMutt
CategoryMail ServersMail Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-2.0
LanguageGoC
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, sourcebinary, source
GitHub stars★ 6,060★ 3,799
First released20192016
ReplacesGoogle Workspace, Microsoft 365Microsoft Outlook

Why pick each one

Choose Maddy Mail Server if…

  • Drastically simpler than traditional stacks
  • Low resource use
Maddy Mail Server details

Choose NeoMutt if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
NeoMutt details

Frequently asked questions

Is Maddy Mail Server or NeoMutt better?

Neither is universally better. Maddy Mail Server has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Maddy Mail Server and NeoMutt free and open-source?

Yes. Maddy Mail Server is licensed under GPL-3.0 and NeoMutt under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Maddy Mail Server and NeoMutt with Docker?

Maddy Mail Server: yes. NeoMutt: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons