Maddy Mail Server vs imapsync
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Maddy Mail Server
Composable, all-in-one mail server in Go
VS
imapsync
Synchronization and migration tool between IMAP accounts
| Feature | Maddy Mail Server | imapsync |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Shell |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 6,060 | ★ 4,118 |
| First released | 2019 | 2003 |
| Replaces | Google Workspace, Microsoft 365 | IMAP migration services |
Why pick each one
Choose Maddy Mail Server if…
- Drastically simpler than traditional stacks
- Low resource use
Choose imapsync if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Active community (4.1k GitHub stars)
- Written in Shell
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Maddy Mail Server or imapsync better?
Neither is universally better. Maddy Mail Server has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Maddy Mail Server and imapsync free and open-source?
Yes. Maddy Mail Server is licensed under GPL-3.0 and imapsync under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Maddy Mail Server and imapsync with Docker?
Maddy Mail Server: yes. imapsync: check the project docs for container support.
Related comparisons
- Maddy Mail Server vs AnonAddy
- imapsync vs AnonAddy
- Maddy Mail Server vs Calligra Suite
- Maddy Mail Server vs Collabora Online
- Maddy Mail Server vs Cozy
- Maddy Mail Server vs CryptPad
- Maddy Mail Server vs chasquid
- Maddy Mail Server vs Docker Mailserver
- imapsync vs Docker Mailserver
- Maddy Mail Server vs Haraka
- imapsync vs Haraka