listmonk vs WildDuck
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
listmonk
Self-hosted newsletter and mailing list manager
VS
WildDuck
Scalable IMAP and POP3 mail server with REST API
| Feature | listmonk | WildDuck |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | EUPL-1.2 |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 22,670 | ★ 2,107 |
| First released | 2020 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Mailchimp, Sendinblue | Microsoft Exchange, Gmail |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is listmonk or WildDuck better?
listmonk is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider WildDuck if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are listmonk and WildDuck free and open-source?
Yes. listmonk is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and WildDuck under EUPL-1.2. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run listmonk and WildDuck with Docker?
listmonk: yes. WildDuck: yes.