Keila vs Mail-in-a-Box

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKeilaMail-in-a-Box
CategoryMail ServersMail Servers
LicenseAGPL-3.0CC0-1.0
LanguageElixirPython
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM512 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcebare-metal, one-click
GitHub stars★ 2,181★ 15,385
First released20212014
ReplacesMailchimp, SendinblueGoogle Workspace, Microsoft 365

Why pick each one

Choose Keila if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.2k GitHub stars)
Keila details

Choose Mail-in-a-Box if…

  • Very beginner-friendly
  • Opinionated, complete stack
Mail-in-a-Box details

Frequently asked questions

Is Keila or Mail-in-a-Box better?

Neither is universally better. Mail-in-a-Box has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Keila and Mail-in-a-Box free and open-source?

Yes. Keila is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Mail-in-a-Box under CC0-1.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Keila and Mail-in-a-Box with Docker?

Keila: yes. Mail-in-a-Box: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons