Haraka vs mailcow

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureHarakamailcow
CategoryMail ServersMail Servers
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB6,144 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 5,612★ 13,245
First released20112016
ReplacesSendGrid, MailgunMicrosoft Exchange, Google Workspace

Why pick each one

Choose Haraka if…

  • Highly customizable
  • Excellent performance
Haraka details

Choose mailcow if…

  • All components preconfigured
  • Active community
mailcow details

Frequently asked questions

Is Haraka or mailcow better?

Neither is universally better. mailcow has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Haraka and mailcow free and open-source?

Yes. Haraka is licensed under MIT and mailcow under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Haraka and mailcow with Docker?

Haraka: yes. mailcow: yes.

Related comparisons