Docker Mailserver vs swaks
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Docker Mailserver
Production-ready, config-driven mail server in a container
VS
swaks
Swiss Army knife for SMTP testing
| Feature | Docker Mailserver | swaks |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Shell | Perl |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 16 MB |
| Deployment | docker | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 18,682 | ★ 1,327 |
| First released | 2015 | 2003 |
| Replaces | Google Workspace, Microsoft 365 | Mailtrap |
Why pick each one
Choose Docker Mailserver if…
- Reproducible, version-controllable config
- Lightweight
Choose swaks if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Perl
Frequently asked questions
Is Docker Mailserver or swaks better?
Neither is universally better. Docker Mailserver has the larger community, while swaks is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Docker Mailserver and swaks free and open-source?
Yes. Docker Mailserver is licensed under MIT and swaks under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Docker Mailserver and swaks with Docker?
Docker Mailserver: yes. swaks: check the project docs for container support.