Docker Mailserver vs Apache SpamAssassin
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Docker Mailserver
Production-ready, config-driven mail server in a container
VS
Apache SpamAssassin
Rule-based and Bayesian anti-spam mail filter
| Feature | Docker Mailserver | Apache SpamAssassin |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Shell | Perl |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 18,682 | ★ 341 |
| First released | 2015 | 2001 |
| Replaces | Google Workspace, Microsoft 365 | Proprietary spam filtering appliances |
Why pick each one
Choose Docker Mailserver if…
- Reproducible, version-controllable config
- Lightweight
Choose Apache SpamAssassin if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Written in Perl
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Docker Mailserver or Apache SpamAssassin better?
Neither is universally better. Docker Mailserver has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Docker Mailserver and Apache SpamAssassin free and open-source?
Yes. Docker Mailserver is licensed under MIT and Apache SpamAssassin under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Docker Mailserver and Apache SpamAssassin with Docker?
Docker Mailserver: yes. Apache SpamAssassin: check the project docs for container support.