Docker Mailserver vs parsedmarc
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Docker Mailserver
Production-ready, config-driven mail server in a container
VS
parsedmarc
Parser and dashboard for DMARC aggregate reports
| Feature | Docker Mailserver | parsedmarc |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Shell | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 18,682 | ★ 1,275 |
| First released | 2015 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Google Workspace, Microsoft 365 | Dmarcian, Valimail |
Why pick each one
Choose Docker Mailserver if…
- Reproducible, version-controllable config
- Lightweight
Choose parsedmarc if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Docker Mailserver or parsedmarc better?
Neither is universally better. Docker Mailserver has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Docker Mailserver and parsedmarc free and open-source?
Yes. Docker Mailserver is licensed under MIT and parsedmarc under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Docker Mailserver and parsedmarc with Docker?
Docker Mailserver: yes. parsedmarc: yes.