Docker Mailserver vs Tine
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Docker Mailserver
Production-ready, config-driven mail server in a container
VS
Tine
Professional open-source groupware and CRM
| Feature | Docker Mailserver | Tine |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Groupware |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Shell | HTML |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 18,682 | ★ 21 |
| First released | 2015 | 2007 |
| Replaces | Google Workspace, Microsoft 365 | Microsoft 365, Google Workspace |
Why pick each one
Choose Docker Mailserver if…
- Reproducible, version-controllable config
- Lightweight
Choose Tine if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in HTML
Frequently asked questions
Is Docker Mailserver or Tine better?
Neither is universally better. Docker Mailserver has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Docker Mailserver and Tine free and open-source?
Yes. Docker Mailserver is licensed under MIT and Tine under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Docker Mailserver and Tine with Docker?
Docker Mailserver: yes. Tine: yes.
Related comparisons
- Docker Mailserver vs aerc
- Docker Mailserver vs afew
- Docker Mailserver vs Afterlogic DAV
- Docker Mailserver vs alot
- Docker Mailserver vs alps
- Docker Mailserver vs AnonAddy
- Docker Mailserver vs Apache James
- Docker Mailserver vs b1gMail
- Docker Mailserver vs bogofilter
- Docker Mailserver vs Calligra Suite
- Tine vs Calligra Suite