Afterlogic WebMail Lite vs Cypht

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAfterlogic WebMail LiteCypht
CategoryMail ServersMail Servers
LicenseAGPL-3.0LGPL-2.1
LanguageShellPHP
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 360★ 1,672
First released20102015
ReplacesGmail, Outlook WebGmail, Outlook Web

Why pick each one

Choose Afterlogic WebMail Lite if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Shell
Afterlogic WebMail Lite details

Choose Cypht if…

  • Released under the LGPL-2.1 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.7k GitHub stars)
  • Written in PHP
Cypht details

Frequently asked questions

Is Afterlogic WebMail Lite or Cypht better?

Neither is universally better. Cypht has the larger community, while Afterlogic WebMail Lite is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Afterlogic WebMail Lite and Cypht free and open-source?

Yes. Afterlogic WebMail Lite is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Cypht under LGPL-2.1. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Afterlogic WebMail Lite and Cypht with Docker?

Afterlogic WebMail Lite: yes. Cypht: yes.

Related comparisons