Elk vs Fizzy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Elk
Progressive web client for Mastodon and Pleroma
VS
Fizzy
Kanban as it should be. Not as it has been
| Feature | Elk | Fizzy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Social Networks | Social Networks |
| License | MIT | free |
| Language | Vue | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, one-click |
| GitHub stars | ★ 6,027 | ★ 8,038 |
| First released | 2022 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Twitter app | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Elk if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 6k GitHub stars
- Written in Vue
Choose Fizzy if…
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- One-click install on common self-host platforms
- Mature project with 8k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Elk or Fizzy better?
Neither is universally better. Fizzy has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Elk and Fizzy free and open-source?
Yes. Elk is licensed under MIT and Fizzy under free. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Elk and Fizzy with Docker?
Elk: check the project docs for container support. Fizzy: yes.