elixire vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureelixireSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 29★ 33,952
First released20202015
ReplacesAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose elixire if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Written in Python
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
elixire details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is elixire or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while elixire is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are elixire and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. elixire is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run elixire and SeaweedFS with Docker?

elixire: check the project docs for container support. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons