elixire vs File Browser

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureelixireFile Browser
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 29★ 35,800
First released20202017
ReplacesDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose elixire if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Written in Python
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
elixire details

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Frequently asked questions

Is elixire or File Browser better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider elixire if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are elixire and File Browser free and open-source?

Yes. elixire is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and File Browser under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run elixire and File Browser with Docker?

elixire: check the project docs for container support. File Browser: yes.

Related comparisons