Elasticsearch vs VictoriaLogs
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Elasticsearch
Distributed search and analytics engine
VS
VictoriaLogs
Fast and resource-efficient open-source log database
| Feature | Elasticsearch | VictoriaLogs |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Monitoring & Status |
| License | Elastic-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Java | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 77,808 | ★ 2,118 |
| First released | 2010 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Algolia, Splunk | Splunk, Elasticsearch |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Elasticsearch or VictoriaLogs better?
Neither is universally better. Elasticsearch has the larger community, while VictoriaLogs is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Elasticsearch and VictoriaLogs free and open-source?
Yes. Elasticsearch is licensed under Elastic-2.0 and VictoriaLogs under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Elasticsearch and VictoriaLogs with Docker?
Elasticsearch: yes. VictoriaLogs: yes.