Elasticsearch vs Mwmbl
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Elasticsearch
Distributed search and analytics engine
VS
Mwmbl
Free, open-source and non-profit web search engine
| Feature | Elasticsearch | Mwmbl |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | Elastic-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Java | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 77,808 | ★ 1,833 |
| First released | 2010 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Algolia, Splunk | Google Search, Bing |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Elasticsearch or Mwmbl better?
Neither is universally better. Elasticsearch has the larger community, while Mwmbl is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Elasticsearch and Mwmbl free and open-source?
Yes. Elasticsearch is licensed under Elastic-2.0 and Mwmbl under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Elasticsearch and Mwmbl with Docker?
Elasticsearch: yes. Mwmbl: yes.