Elasticsearch Exporter vs Glances

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureElasticsearch ExporterGlances
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseApache-2.0LGPL-3.0
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, kubernetesdocker, bare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 2,085★ 33,269
First released20162012
ReplacesElastic Stack Monitoring, Datadog ElasticsearchDatadog

Why pick each one

Choose Elasticsearch Exporter if…

  • Avoids proprietary monitoring
  • Broad metric coverage
Elasticsearch Exporter details

Choose Glances if…

  • Very easy to run
  • Lightweight
  • Good single-host overview
Glances details

Frequently asked questions

Is Elasticsearch Exporter or Glances better?

Neither is universally better. Glances has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Elasticsearch Exporter and Glances free and open-source?

Yes. Elasticsearch Exporter is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Glances under LGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Elasticsearch Exporter and Glances with Docker?

Elasticsearch Exporter: yes. Glances: yes.

Related comparisons