ecoDMS vs Stirling PDF
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ecoDMS
Document archiving and management with OCR
VS
Stirling PDF
Powerful locally hosted web-based PDF toolkit
| Feature | ecoDMS | Stirling PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | Proprietary | MIT |
| Language | Java | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | — | ★ 89,077 |
| First released | 2013 | 2023 |
| Replaces | DocuWare | Adobe Acrobat, Smallpdf |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is ecoDMS or Stirling PDF better?
Stirling PDF is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider ecoDMS if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are ecoDMS and Stirling PDF free and open-source?
Yes. ecoDMS is licensed under Proprietary and Stirling PDF under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ecoDMS and Stirling PDF with Docker?
ecoDMS: yes. Stirling PDF: yes.