SHSelfHostIndex

Duplicati vs Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
DU Duplicati Free backup software with a friendly web UI VS BA Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup Time Machine-style backups for Linux and macOS using rsync
FeatureDuplicatiBackup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageC#Shell
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB32 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbinary
GitHub stars★ 14,864★ 3,608
First released20082014
ReplacesBackblaze, CarboniteTime Machine

Why pick each one

Choose Duplicati if…

  • Friendly GUI
  • Broad storage support
  • Free
Duplicati details

Choose Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (3.6k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Shell
Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup details

Frequently asked questions

Is Duplicati or Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup better?

Neither is universally better. Duplicati has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Duplicati and Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup free and open-source?

Yes. Duplicati is licensed under MIT and Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Duplicati and Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup with Docker?

Duplicati: yes. Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons