SHSelfHostIndex

Duplicati vs Tarsnap GUI

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
DU Duplicati Free backup software with a friendly web UI VS TA Tarsnap GUI Cross-platform desktop front end for Tarsnap backups
FeatureDuplicatiTarsnap GUI
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseMITBSD-2-Clause
LanguageC#C++
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbinary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 14,864★ 250
First released20082016
ReplacesBackblaze, CarboniteBackblaze

Why pick each one

Choose Duplicati if…

  • Friendly GUI
  • Broad storage support
  • Free
Duplicati details

Choose Tarsnap GUI if…

  • Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in C++
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Tarsnap GUI details

Frequently asked questions

Is Duplicati or Tarsnap GUI better?

Neither is universally better. Duplicati has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Duplicati and Tarsnap GUI free and open-source?

Yes. Duplicati is licensed under MIT and Tarsnap GUI under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Duplicati and Tarsnap GUI with Docker?

Duplicati: yes. Tarsnap GUI: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons