Duplicati vs SnapRAID
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Duplicati
Free backup software with a friendly web UI
VS
SnapRAID
Parity-based backup for disk arrays of large files
| Feature | Duplicati | SnapRAID |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | C# | C |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,864 | ★ 2,543 |
| First released | 2008 | 2011 |
| Replaces | Backblaze, Carbonite | unRAID parity |
Why pick each one
Choose SnapRAID if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Duplicati or SnapRAID better?
Duplicati is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider SnapRAID if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Duplicati and SnapRAID free and open-source?
Yes. Duplicati is licensed under MIT and SnapRAID under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Duplicati and SnapRAID with Docker?
Duplicati: yes. SnapRAID: check the project docs for container support.