Duplicati vs ElkarBackup alt Snapper
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Duplicati
Free backup software with a friendly web UI
VS
ElkarBackup alt Snapper
Btrfs snapshot management tool with rollback
| Feature | Duplicati | ElkarBackup alt Snapper |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | C# | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,864 | ★ 1,158 |
| First released | 2008 | 2011 |
| Replaces | Backblaze, Carbonite | Time Machine |
Why pick each one
Choose ElkarBackup alt Snapper if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in C++
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Duplicati or ElkarBackup alt Snapper better?
Duplicati is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider ElkarBackup alt Snapper if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Duplicati and ElkarBackup alt Snapper free and open-source?
Yes. Duplicati is licensed under MIT and ElkarBackup alt Snapper under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Duplicati and ElkarBackup alt Snapper with Docker?
Duplicati: yes. ElkarBackup alt Snapper: check the project docs for container support.