Duplicati vs HashBackup
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Duplicati
Free backup software with a friendly web UI
VS
HashBackup
Efficient command-line backup with deduplication
| Feature | Duplicati | HashBackup |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | C# | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,864 | ★ 1 |
| First released | 2008 | 2009 |
| Replaces | Backblaze, Carbonite | CrashPlan |
Why pick each one
Choose HashBackup if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Duplicati or HashBackup better?
Duplicati is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider HashBackup if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Duplicati and HashBackup free and open-source?
Yes. Duplicati is licensed under MIT and HashBackup under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Duplicati and HashBackup with Docker?
Duplicati: yes. HashBackup: check the project docs for container support.