Duplicacy vs Wayback
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Duplicacy
Lock-free deduplication cloud backup tool
VS
Wayback
A self-hosted toolkit for archiving webpages to the Internet Archive,
| Feature | Duplicacy | Wayback |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | Proprietary | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,671 | ★ 2,223 |
| First released | 2016 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Backblaze, Carbonite | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Wayback if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Active community (2.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Duplicacy or Wayback better?
Neither is universally better. Duplicacy has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Duplicacy and Wayback free and open-source?
Yes. Duplicacy is licensed under Proprietary and Wayback under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Duplicacy and Wayback with Docker?
Duplicacy: yes. Wayback: check the project docs for container support.