Backrest vs Duplicacy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBackrestDuplicacy
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-3.0Proprietary
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 7,071★ 5,671
First released20242016
ReplacesBackblazeBackblaze, Carbonite

Why pick each one

Choose Backrest if…

  • Makes Restic approachable
  • Good scheduling
  • Lightweight
Backrest details

Choose Duplicacy if…

  • Efficient deduplication
  • Good cloud support
  • Reliable
Duplicacy details

Frequently asked questions

Is Backrest or Duplicacy better?

Backrest is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Duplicacy if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Backrest and Duplicacy free and open-source?

Yes. Backrest is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Duplicacy under Proprietary. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Backrest and Duplicacy with Docker?

Backrest: yes. Duplicacy: yes.

Related comparisons