SHSelfHostIndex

Duplicacy vs Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
DU Duplicacy Lock-free deduplication cloud backup tool VS BA Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup Time Machine-style backups for Linux and macOS using rsync
FeatureDuplicacyBackup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseProprietaryMIT
LanguageGoShell
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB32 MB
Deploymentbinary, dockerbinary
GitHub stars★ 5,671★ 3,608
First released20162014
ReplacesBackblaze, CarboniteTime Machine

Why pick each one

Choose Duplicacy if…

  • Efficient deduplication
  • Good cloud support
  • Reliable
Duplicacy details

Choose Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (3.6k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Shell
Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup details

Frequently asked questions

Is Duplicacy or Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup better?

Neither is universally better. Duplicacy has the larger community, while Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Duplicacy and Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup free and open-source?

Yes. Duplicacy is licensed under Proprietary and Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Duplicacy and Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup with Docker?

Duplicacy: yes. Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons