Duplicacy vs Sosse
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Duplicacy
Lock-free deduplication cloud backup tool
VS
Sosse
Selenium based search engine and crawler with offline archiving
| Feature | Duplicacy | Sosse |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | Proprietary | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,671 | ★ 2 |
| First released | 2016 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Backblaze, Carbonite | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Sosse if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Duplicacy or Sosse better?
Neither is universally better. Duplicacy has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Duplicacy and Sosse free and open-source?
Yes. Duplicacy is licensed under Proprietary and Sosse under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Duplicacy and Sosse with Docker?
Duplicacy: yes. Sosse: yes.