Duplicacy vs Restic Browser

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDuplicacyRestic Browser
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseProprietaryMIT
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinary, dockerbinary
GitHub stars★ 5,671★ 1,275
First released20162022
ReplacesBackblaze, CarboniteTime Machine

Why pick each one

Choose Duplicacy if…

  • Efficient deduplication
  • Good cloud support
  • Reliable
Duplicacy details

Choose Restic Browser if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Restic Browser details

Frequently asked questions

Is Duplicacy or Restic Browser better?

Neither is universally better. Duplicacy has the larger community, while Restic Browser is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Duplicacy and Restic Browser free and open-source?

Yes. Duplicacy is licensed under Proprietary and Restic Browser under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Duplicacy and Restic Browser with Docker?

Duplicacy: yes. Restic Browser: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons