act vs Gitea Act Runner
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted ci/cd & build options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
act
Run GitHub Actions workflows locally for fast feedback
VS
Gitea Act Runner
CI/CD runner for Gitea Actions
| Feature | act | Gitea Act Runner |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CI/CD & Build | CI/CD & Build |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 71,417 | ★ 800 |
| First released | 2019 | 2023 |
| Replaces | GitHub Actions | GitHub Actions |
Why pick each one
Choose Gitea Act Runner if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is act or Gitea Act Runner better?
act is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Gitea Act Runner if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are act and Gitea Act Runner free and open-source?
Yes. act is licensed under MIT and Gitea Act Runner under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run act and Gitea Act Runner with Docker?
act: check the project docs for container support. Gitea Act Runner: yes.