Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs ioBroker
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Mozilla WebThings Gateway
Open gateway for the decentralized web of things
VS
ioBroker
Integration platform for the Internet of Things
| Feature | Mozilla WebThings Gateway | ioBroker |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Home Automation | Home Automation |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Shell |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,643 | ★ 1,373 |
| First released | 2018 | 2014 |
| Replaces | SmartThings, Google Home | SmartThings, Hubitat |
Why pick each one
Choose Mozilla WebThings Gateway if…
- Open standards-based
- Privacy-focused
Frequently asked questions
Is Mozilla WebThings Gateway or ioBroker better?
Neither is universally better. Mozilla WebThings Gateway has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Mozilla WebThings Gateway and ioBroker free and open-source?
Yes. Mozilla WebThings Gateway is licensed under MPL-2.0 and ioBroker under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Mozilla WebThings Gateway and ioBroker with Docker?
Mozilla WebThings Gateway: yes. ioBroker: yes.
Related comparisons
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs Frigate NVR Companion go2rtc
- ioBroker vs Frigate NVR Companion go2rtc
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs Domoticz
- ioBroker vs Domoticz
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs Jeedom
- ioBroker vs Jeedom
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs EMQX
- ioBroker vs EMQX
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs ESPHome
- ioBroker vs ESPHome