Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs Homebridge
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Mozilla WebThings Gateway
Open gateway for the decentralized web of things
VS
Homebridge
Bring non-HomeKit smart devices into Apple Home
| Feature | Mozilla WebThings Gateway | Homebridge |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Home Automation | Home Automation |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, docker | docker, bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,643 | ★ 25,444 |
| First released | 2018 | 2014 |
| Replaces | SmartThings, Google Home | Apple HomeKit hubs |
Why pick each one
Choose Mozilla WebThings Gateway if…
- Open standards-based
- Privacy-focused
Frequently asked questions
Is Mozilla WebThings Gateway or Homebridge better?
Homebridge is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Mozilla WebThings Gateway if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Mozilla WebThings Gateway and Homebridge free and open-source?
Yes. Mozilla WebThings Gateway is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Homebridge under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Mozilla WebThings Gateway and Homebridge with Docker?
Mozilla WebThings Gateway: yes. Homebridge: yes.
Related comparisons
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs Frigate NVR Companion go2rtc
- Homebridge vs Frigate NVR Companion go2rtc
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs Domoticz
- Homebridge vs Domoticz
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs Jeedom
- Homebridge vs Jeedom
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs EMQX
- Homebridge vs EMQX
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs ESPHome
- Homebridge vs ESPHome