Discourse vs snac
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Discourse
Modern open-source community discussion platform
VS
snac
Minimalist ActivityPub server in C
| Feature | Discourse | snac |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Social Networks | Social Networks |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | C |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 47,619 | ★ 900 |
| First released | 2013 | 2022 |
| Replaces | phpBB, Reddit | Twitter, Mastodon |
Why pick each one
Choose snac if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Discourse or snac better?
Neither is universally better. Discourse has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Discourse and snac free and open-source?
Yes. Discourse is licensed under GPL-2.0 and snac under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Discourse and snac with Docker?
Discourse: yes. snac: check the project docs for container support.