Bridgy vs Discourse
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Bridgy
Connect personal websites to social networks
VS
Discourse
Modern open-source community discussion platform
| Feature | Bridgy | Discourse |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Social Networks | Social Networks |
| License | CC0-1.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Python | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 836 | ★ 47,619 |
| First released | 2013 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Disqus, Hosted social embeds | phpBB, Reddit |
Why pick each one
Choose Bridgy if…
- Released under the CC0-1.0 license
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Bridgy or Discourse better?
Discourse is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Bridgy if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Bridgy and Discourse free and open-source?
Yes. Bridgy is licensed under CC0-1.0 and Discourse under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Bridgy and Discourse with Docker?
Bridgy: check the project docs for container support. Discourse: yes.