Dino vs ZNC
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Dino | ZNC |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Matrix & XMPP |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Vala | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,472 | ★ 2,123 |
| First released | 2017 | 2004 |
| Replaces | Skype, Slack | IRCCloud |
Why pick each one
Choose Dino if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in Vala
Frequently asked questions
Is Dino or ZNC better?
Dino is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider ZNC if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Dino and ZNC free and open-source?
Yes. Dino is licensed under GPL-3.0 and ZNC under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dino and ZNC with Docker?
Dino: check the project docs for container support. ZNC: yes.