Dino vs Simple-Matrix-Bot-Lib
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Dino
Modern XMPP chat client for the desktop
VS
Simple-Matrix-Bot-Lib
Beginner-friendly framework for Matrix bots
| Feature | Dino | Simple-Matrix-Bot-Lib |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Matrix & XMPP |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Vala | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,472 | ★ 100 |
| First released | 2017 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Skype, Slack | Slack bot framework |
Why pick each one
Choose Dino if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in Vala
Choose Simple-Matrix-Bot-Lib if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Dino or Simple-Matrix-Bot-Lib better?
Neither is universally better. Dino has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Dino and Simple-Matrix-Bot-Lib free and open-source?
Yes. Dino is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Simple-Matrix-Bot-Lib under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dino and Simple-Matrix-Bot-Lib with Docker?
Dino: check the project docs for container support. Simple-Matrix-Bot-Lib: check the project docs for container support.