Dino vs Hydrogen
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Dino | Hydrogen |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Matrix & XMPP |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Vala | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,472 | ★ 709 |
| First released | 2017 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Skype, Slack | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Dino if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in Vala
Choose Hydrogen if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Dino or Hydrogen better?
Neither is universally better. Dino has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Dino and Hydrogen free and open-source?
Yes. Dino is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Hydrogen under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dino and Hydrogen with Docker?
Dino: check the project docs for container support. Hydrogen: check the project docs for container support.