Dify vs Fabric
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted self-hosted ai options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Dify
Open-source platform for building production LLM apps
VS
Fabric
Open-source framework for augmenting humans with AI
| Feature | Dify | Fabric |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Self-Hosted AI | Self-Hosted AI |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 151,746 | ★ 43,353 |
| First released | 2023 | 2024 |
| Replaces | OpenAI Assistants, Vertex AI Agent Builder | ChatGPT |
Why pick each one
Choose Dify if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 151.7k GitHub stars
Choose Fabric if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 43.4k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Dify or Fabric better?
Neither is universally better. Dify has the larger community, while Fabric is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Dify and Fabric free and open-source?
Yes. Dify is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Fabric under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dify and Fabric with Docker?
Dify: yes. Fabric: check the project docs for container support.