Anse vs Dify

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted self-hosted ai options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAnseDify
CategorySelf-Hosted AISelf-Hosted AI
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB4,096 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcedocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 1,976★ 151,746
First released20232023
ReplacesChatGPTOpenAI Assistants, Vertex AI Agent Builder

Why pick each one

Choose Anse if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2k GitHub stars)
Anse details

Choose Dify if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 151.7k GitHub stars
Dify details

Frequently asked questions

Is Anse or Dify better?

Neither is universally better. Dify has the larger community, while Anse is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Anse and Dify free and open-source?

Yes. Anse is licensed under MIT and Dify under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Anse and Dify with Docker?

Anse: yes. Dify: yes.

Related comparisons