Dex vs LemonLDAP::NG
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Dex
OpenID Connect identity provider with pluggable connectors
VS
LemonLDAP::NG
Web single sign-on and access management system
| Feature | Dex | LemonLDAP::NG |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Perl |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,019 | ★ 84 |
| First released | 2016 | 2005 |
| Replaces | Okta, Auth0 | Okta, PingFederate |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Dex or LemonLDAP::NG better?
Dex is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider LemonLDAP::NG if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Dex and LemonLDAP::NG free and open-source?
Yes. Dex is licensed under Apache-2.0 and LemonLDAP::NG under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dex and LemonLDAP::NG with Docker?
Dex: yes. LemonLDAP::NG: yes.