Element X vs Snikket
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Element X
Next-generation fast Matrix client for mobile
VS
Snikket
Easy self-hosted XMPP chat for groups
| Feature | Element X | Snikket |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Social Networks |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Swift | Lua |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 912 | ★ 437 |
| First released | 2022 | 2020 |
| Replaces | WhatsApp, Signal | WhatsApp, Signal |
Why pick each one
Choose Element X if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Swift
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Element X or Snikket better?
Neither is universally better. Element X has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Element X and Snikket free and open-source?
Yes. Element X is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Snikket under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Element X and Snikket with Docker?
Element X: check the project docs for container support. Snikket: yes.