DebOps vs mailcow

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDebOpsmailcow
CategoryMail ServersMail Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageJinjaJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB6,144 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 1,416★ 13,245
First released20262016
ReplacesMicrosoft Exchange, Google Workspace

Why pick each one

Choose DebOps if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Active community (1.4k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Jinja
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
DebOps details

Choose mailcow if…

  • All components preconfigured
  • Active community
mailcow details

Frequently asked questions

Is DebOps or mailcow better?

Neither is universally better. mailcow has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are DebOps and mailcow free and open-source?

Yes. DebOps is licensed under GPL-3.0 and mailcow under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run DebOps and mailcow with Docker?

DebOps: check the project docs for container support. mailcow: yes.

Related comparisons