Dawarich vs BRouter
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Dawarich
Self-hosted location history tracker and visualizer
VS
BRouter
Self-hosted bike and hiking route planner
| Feature | Dawarich | BRouter |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,036 | ★ 691 |
| First released | 2024 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Google Maps Timeline | Komoot, Strava routes |
Why pick each one
Choose Dawarich if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 10k GitHub stars
- Written in Ruby
Choose BRouter if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Java
Frequently asked questions
Is Dawarich or BRouter better?
Neither is universally better. Dawarich has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Dawarich and BRouter free and open-source?
Yes. Dawarich is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and BRouter under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dawarich and BRouter with Docker?
Dawarich: yes. BRouter: yes.