SHSelfHostIndex

datarhei Core vs MediaMTX

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
DA datarhei Core Self-hosted media server for video and camera stream processing VS ME MediaMTX Ready-to-use media server and RTSP/WebRTC proxy
Featuredatarhei CoreMediaMTX
CategoryVideo SurveillanceVideo Surveillance
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 277★ 19,747
First released20222019
ReplacesWowza, commercial video serversWowza

Why pick each one

Choose datarhei Core if…

  • Flexible stream handling
  • Good API
datarhei Core details

Choose MediaMTX if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Wide protocol support
MediaMTX details

Frequently asked questions

Is datarhei Core or MediaMTX better?

MediaMTX is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider datarhei Core if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are datarhei Core and MediaMTX free and open-source?

Yes. datarhei Core is licensed under Apache-2.0 and MediaMTX under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run datarhei Core and MediaMTX with Docker?

datarhei Core: yes. MediaMTX: yes.

Related comparisons