darktable vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturedarktableSeaweedFS
CategoryPhoto ManagementFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageCGo
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM2,048 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binary, snapdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 12,904★ 33,952
First released20092015
ReplacesAdobe LightroomAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose darktable if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 12.9k GitHub stars
  • Written in C
darktable details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is darktable or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while darktable is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are darktable and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. darktable is licensed under GPL-3.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run darktable and SeaweedFS with Docker?

darktable: check the project docs for container support. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons