darktable vs nanogallery2
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
darktable
Open-source photography workflow and RAW developer
VS
nanogallery2
JavaScript photo and video gallery library you host yourself
| Feature | darktable | nanogallery2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | C | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, binary, snap | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 12,904 | ★ 791 |
| First released | 2009 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Adobe Lightroom | Flickr, SmugMug |
Why pick each one
Choose darktable if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Mature project with 12.9k GitHub stars
- Written in C
Frequently asked questions
Is darktable or nanogallery2 better?
Neither is universally better. darktable has the larger community, while nanogallery2 is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are darktable and nanogallery2 free and open-source?
Yes. darktable is licensed under GPL-3.0 and nanogallery2 under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run darktable and nanogallery2 with Docker?
darktable: check the project docs for container support. nanogallery2: check the project docs for container support.