Onyx vs PaddleOCR

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted self-hosted ai options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOnyxPaddleOCR
CategorySelf-Hosted AISelf-Hosted AI
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguagePythonPython
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM8,192 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, source
GitHub stars★ 31,496★ 87,227
First released20232020
ReplacesGlean, ChatGPT EnterpriseGoogle Cloud Vision, AWS Textract

Why pick each one

Choose Onyx if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 31.5k GitHub stars
Onyx details

Choose PaddleOCR if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 87.2k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
PaddleOCR details

Frequently asked questions

Is Onyx or PaddleOCR better?

Neither is universally better. PaddleOCR has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Onyx and PaddleOCR free and open-source?

Yes. Onyx is licensed under MIT and PaddleOCR under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Onyx and PaddleOCR with Docker?

Onyx: yes. PaddleOCR: yes.

Related comparisons