BionicGPT vs Onyx

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted self-hosted ai options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBionicGPTOnyx
CategorySelf-Hosted AISelf-Hosted AI
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageRustPython
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM4,096 MB8,192 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetesdocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 2,347★ 31,496
First released20232023
ReplacesChatGPT EnterpriseGlean, ChatGPT Enterprise

Why pick each one

Choose BionicGPT if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Active community (2.3k GitHub stars)
BionicGPT details

Choose Onyx if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 31.5k GitHub stars
Onyx details

Frequently asked questions

Is BionicGPT or Onyx better?

Neither is universally better. Onyx has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are BionicGPT and Onyx free and open-source?

Yes. BionicGPT is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Onyx under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run BionicGPT and Onyx with Docker?

BionicGPT: yes. Onyx: yes.

Related comparisons