Onyx vs OpenClaw

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted self-hosted ai options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOnyxOpenClaw
CategorySelf-Hosted AISelf-Hosted AI
LicenseMITfree
LanguagePythonTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM8,192 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, one-click
GitHub stars★ 31,496★ 385,509
First released20232022
ReplacesGlean, ChatGPT Enterprise

Why pick each one

Choose Onyx if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 31.5k GitHub stars
Onyx details

Choose OpenClaw if…

  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • One-click install on common self-host platforms
  • Mature project with 385.5k GitHub stars
OpenClaw details

Frequently asked questions

Is Onyx or OpenClaw better?

OpenClaw is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Onyx if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Onyx and OpenClaw free and open-source?

Yes. Onyx is licensed under MIT and OpenClaw under free. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Onyx and OpenClaw with Docker?

Onyx: yes. OpenClaw: yes.

Related comparisons