dae vs NPS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
dae
eBPF-based transparent proxy with traffic splitting
VS
NPS
Lightweight proxy server for intranet penetration
| Feature | dae | NPS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 6,058 | ★ 34,157 |
| First released | 2023 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Clash | ngrok |
Why pick each one
Choose dae if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Mature project with 6.1k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose NPS if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 34.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is dae or NPS better?
NPS is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider dae if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are dae and NPS free and open-source?
Yes. dae is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and NPS under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run dae and NPS with Docker?
dae: check the project docs for container support. NPS: yes.