CryFS vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCryFSPuter
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseLGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageRustTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 2,297★ 43,003
First released20152026
ReplacesBoxcryptor

Why pick each one

Choose CryFS if…

  • Strong metadata protection
  • Pairs with any sync tool
CryFS details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is CryFS or Puter better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are CryFS and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. CryFS is licensed under LGPL-3.0 and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run CryFS and Puter with Docker?

CryFS: check the project docs for container support. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons