Cortex vs Grafana

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCortexGrafana
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setup≈5-minute setup
Health score90 · Excellent100 · Excellent
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, bare-metal, helm
GitHub stars★ 5,865★ 76,876
First released20162014
ReplacesDatadog, Grafana CloudDatadog

What are Cortex and Grafana?

Cortex

Cortex provides a horizontally scalable, highly available, multi-tenant, long-term store for Prometheus metrics. It offers a single API endpoint for querying and writing time series data across clusters.

  • Multi-tenant metrics storage
  • Horizontally scalable
  • Prometheus-compatible API
  • Long-term retention

Read the full Cortex guide →

Grafana

Grafana is an open-source analytics and visualization platform that builds dashboards from many data sources. It targets operators and analysts who need rich observability dashboards. It is deployed via Docker, packages, or Helm.

  • Dashboards from many data sources
  • Alerting and annotations
  • Large plugin ecosystem
  • Templating and variables

Read the full Grafana guide →

Cortex vs Grafana: key differences

Cortex is written in Go, while Grafana is built with TypeScript. Licensing differs — Apache-2.0 for Cortex versus AGPL-3.0 for Grafana. Grafana is the lighter option, starting around 512 MB of RAM against 1,024 MB for Cortex. Grafana is the more established project (first released 2014), while Cortex arrived in 2016. Grafana has the considerably larger community, at 76,876 GitHub stars versus 5,865.

Why pick each one

Choose Cortex if…

  • Built for very large scale
  • True multi-tenancy

Watch out for

  • Operationally heavy
  • Overkill for small setups
Cortex details

Choose Grafana if…

  • Beautiful flexible dashboards
  • Broad data source support
  • Strong community

Watch out for

  • Not a data store itself
  • Alerting can be complex
Grafana details

Frequently asked questions

Is Cortex or Grafana better?

Grafana is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Cortex if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Cortex and Grafana free and open-source?

Yes. Cortex is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Grafana under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Cortex and Grafana with Docker?

Cortex: yes. Grafana: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Cortex or Grafana?

Grafana has the smaller minimum footprint at 512 MB of RAM, compared to about 1,024 MB for Cortex. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons